uschindler edited a comment on pull request #308: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/pull/308#issuecomment-922514111
> > by the way @uschindler, one idea i had when going thru this stuff, is maybe to put these VHs into `org.apache.lucene.util.ArrayUtil` instead of `org.apache.lucene.util.BitUtil`. It seems like a more natural place for people to look? > > I thought about that, too. ArrayUtil is more about handling _arrays_ (like resize,...), but this is more about encoding/decoding values in a byte array. BitUtil is more about encoding/decoding (e.g, zigzag encoding is also there). So to me the latter fitted better. > > An alternative would be a new class `PrimitiveValueConverter` or similar. > > We can easily change this at a later stage using eclipse's "move" refactoring. Another thing for later: We may also change to static methods in a new utility class PrimitiveValueConverter and hide the varhandles again. I know this is one more abstraction, but the "nice" thing is: We have type safety. VarHandles are not so easy to use, because autocomplete does not work. By wrapping with static methods it is enforced by compiler (of course this adds more code and less SLOC is harder to reach)! In addition, in later Java versions (Java 16) you can change varhandles to be "type safe" (they behave like `MethodHandle#invokeExact()` and do not silently adapt types: https://docs.oracle.com/en/java/javase/16/docs/api/java.base/java/lang/invoke/VarHandle.html#withInvokeExactBehavior() See more detailed description: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8255375 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
