[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17487377#comment-17487377
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-10050:
----------------------------------------------------------
Commit dd11b2b5792cf5e6914e0726d8c2e2b9a6ec0b5d in lucene's branch
refs/heads/branch_9x from Greg Miller
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=lucene.git;h=dd11b2b ]
LUCENE-10050 Remove DrillSideways#search(DrillDownQuery,Collector) in favor of
DrillSideways#search(DrillDownQuery,CollectorManager) (#650)
Co-authored-by: Gautam Worah <[email protected]>
> Remove DrillSideways#search(DrillDownQuery,Collector) in favor of
> DrillSideways#search(DrillDownQuery,CollectorManager)
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10050
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10050
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: modules/facet
> Reporter: Greg Miller
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 1.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> With similar motivation to LUCENE-10002, we should consider doing away with
> the ability to directly provide a Collector to DrillSideways in favor of
> always accepting a CollectorManager. Just like with IndexSearcher, it's
> trappy that you can provide an Executor when setting up DrillSideways and
> then not leverage it by directly providing a single Collector.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
