[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17564747#comment-17564747
]
Zach Chen commented on LUCENE-10480:
------------------------------------
{quote}I'll see if I can run the original nightly benchmark code / tests from
my machine to see if there's any difference.
{quote}
I tried to run ** *nightlyBench.py* locally on my machine over the weekend, but
that turns out to require some changes to the script itself, and I haven't
been able to run it fully so far.
On the other hand, I tried a few more run configurations with ** *localrun.py,*
including running it in a virtual ubuntu box (as the nightly benchmark runs on
linux box), but still have no luck so far re-producing the
[AndHighOrMedMed|https://home.apache.org/~mikemccand/lucenebench/AndHighOrMedMed.html]
slow-down.
[~jpountz], just curious, are you able to reproduce the slow-down locally on
your end as well ?
> Specialize 2-clauses disjunctions
> ---------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-10480
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10480
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Adrien Grand
> Priority: Minor
> Time Spent: 7h 20m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> WANDScorer is nice, but it also has lots of overhead to maintain its
> invariants: one linked list for the current candidates, one priority queue of
> scorers that are behind, another one for scorers that are ahead. All this
> could be simplified in the 2-clauses case, which feels worth specializing for
> as it's very common that end users enter queries that only have two terms?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@lucene.apache.org
