mikemccand commented on issue #13856: URL: https://github.com/apache/lucene/issues/13856#issuecomment-2413911330
> The luceneutil benchmarks don't show the issue that we see in the Elasticsearch benchmarks, as it seems that there is no coverage for _search after_. Also, the issue we see is very dependent on the actual dataset, and the target competitive range based on the _after_ value. Hrpmh that is an annoying gap ... I'll open a luceneutil issue to add coverage for `searchAfter` so we don't lose track. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
