[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6207?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16018508#comment-16018508
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-6207:
-------------------------------------

Github user khmarbaise commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/119#discussion_r117611940
  
    --- Diff: 
maven-model-builder/src/test/java/org/apache/maven/model/validation/DefaultModelValidatorTest.java
 ---
    @@ -604,17 +609,21 @@ public void testBadImportScopeClassifier()
                             
"'dependencyManagement.dependencies.dependency.classifier' for test:a:pom:cls 
must be empty" );
         }
     
    -    public void testSystemPathRefersToProjectBasedir()
    +    public void testSystemPathRefersToProjectBasedirAndDeprecatedScope()
    --- End diff --
    
    I think it's better having different test cases. Keeping the old test cases 
and create new ones for the changed behaviour. That makes it safe not to break 
previous behaviour,


> Create WARNINGs in case of using system scope
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MNG-6207
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6207
>             Project: Maven
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.0
>            Reporter: Karl Heinz Marbaise
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.5.1-candidate, 3.6.0
>
>
> Currently the documentation has already marked the usage of:
> {code:xml}
>  <dependency>
>       <groupId>javax.sql</groupId>
>       <artifactId>jdbc-stdext</artifactId>
>       <version>2.0</version>
>       <scope>system</scope>
>       <systemPath>${java.home}/lib/rt.jar</systemPath>
>     </dependency>
> {code}
> as 
> [deprecated|https://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html#System_Dependencies].
>  So we should start to produce WARNING during a build if someone uses it...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to