[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1546?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16816884#comment-16816884
 ] 

Marc Philipp edited comment on SUREFIRE-1546 at 4/14/19 7:47 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

{code:java}
@DisplayName("Some tests"
class SomeTests {
  @ParameterizedTest(name = "x = {0}")
  @DisplayName("a parameterized test")
  @ValueSource(intValue = {15, 54})
  void bar(int x) {}
}
{code}
Given the code above, the test tree would look like the following:
{code:java}
JUnit Jupiter
└── Some tests (com.acme.SomeTests)
    └── a parameterized test (bar(int))
        ├── x = 15 (bar(int)[0])
        └── x = 54 (bar(int)[1])
{code}
I put the "legacy reporting name" that JUnit provides in parentheses.

In the long run, I think Surefire should move beyond the strict class-method 
tuple requirement. As [~sor] mentioned above, that will require a new reporting 
format which we plan to work on for JUnit 5.6. For now, Surefire could combine 
the display name of the method ("a parameterized test") with the one for the 
invocation ("x = ...").


was (Author: marcphilipp):
{code:java}
@DisplayName("Some tests"
class SomeTests {
  @ParameterizedTest(name = "x = {0}")
  @DisplayName("a parameterized test")
  @ValueSource(intValue = {15, 54})
  void bar(int x) {}
}
{code}

Given the code above, the test tree would look like the following:

{code}
JUnit Jupiter
└── Some tests (com.acme.SomeTests)
    └── a parameterized test (bar(int))
        ├── x = 15 (bar(int)[0])
        └── x = 54 (bar(int)[1])
{code}

In put the "legacy reporting name" that JUnit provides in parentheses.

In the long run, I think Surefire should move beyond the strict class-method 
tuple requirement. As [~sor] mentioned above, that will require a new reporting 
format which we plan to work on for JUnit 5.6. For now, Surefire could combine 
the display name of the method ("a parameterized test") with the one for the 
invocation ("x = ...").

> JUnit 5 runner does not honor JUnit 5 display names
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SUREFIRE-1546
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SUREFIRE-1546
>             Project: Maven Surefire
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: JUnit 5.x support
>    Affects Versions: 2.22.0
>            Reporter: Romain Manni-Bucau
>            Assignee: Tibor Digana
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: junit5
>             Fix For: 3.0.0-M4
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> JUnit 5 runner should respect the test @DisplayName instead of displaying the 
> classname if any is defined. Seems last release doesn't support that feature 
> of JUnit 5 making the console output and reports not the expected ones.
>  
> Origin: https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/issues/990



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to