michael-o commented on pull request #565: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/565#issuecomment-941029226
> > > @cstamas the only agreement was for @apache/maven project. For the API there is no slf4j agreement but the agreement to get a logging API. Since JUL is the built-in and well known java logging API and from maven standpoint we can completely control it properly for all plugins and components it makes sense to not reinvent the wheel and just reuse this _API_ (we don't have to use the impl and should likely stay on slf4j until we rediscuss it). So don't read it as a "why not" but more a "the API we should use is already there". No JULI please, it is horrible. A pain in the ass in Tomcat. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
