michael-o commented on pull request #565: URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/565#issuecomment-941068464
> > > @michael-o if you mean JULi I will not dig but if you mean JUL I think it is wrong. Technically JUL is 1-1 with slf4j without drawbacks SLF4J brings for a plugin system like mojos. The only drawback of JULI is the fact it is global and configured on the JVM, two trivial points to solve at maven level, even without tomcat hacks IMHO. You are right. I need to distinguish between JUL and JULI. Thank you for making me aware. JUL lacks placeholders like SLF4J has, though. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
