[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6609?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17622135#comment-17622135
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on MNG-6609:
-------------------------------------
gnodet commented on PR #835:
URL: https://github.com/apache/maven/pull/835#issuecomment-1286665218
That really looks like a hack to avoid defining a new activation type to me.
Shouldn't we extend the model to add a packaging based activation ?
> Profile activation by packaging
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: MNG-6609
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-6609
> Project: Maven
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Profiles
> Affects Versions: 3.6.0
> Reporter: Konrad Windszus
> Assignee: Konrad Windszus
> Priority: Major
>
> Due to the lack of mixins, it is common that modules which use different
> packagings share the same parent pom. As those often use different
> dependencies/plugins, it would be nice to have profiles which are activated
> based on the packaging of a module. That is currently not possible.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
