slawekjaranowski commented on code in PR #347:
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/maven-clean-plugin/pull/347#discussion_r4111520730


##########
src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugins/clean/BackgroundCleaner.java:
##########
@@ -255,18 +381,156 @@ boolean fastDelete(Path baseDir) throws IOException {
     }
 
     /**
-     * Deletes the given directory without logging messages and without 
throwing {@link IOException}.
-     * The exceptions are stored for reporting after the end of the session.
+     * Deletes the given directory in a background thread using batch retry.
+     * Unlike the foreground {@link Cleaner}, this method does not call {@code 
System.gc()}
+     * or sleep per file, avoiding the stop-the-world JVM pauses that caused 
the performance
+     * regression described in MCLEAN-102.
+     *
+     * <p>The deletion proceeds in two passes:</p>
+     * <ol>
+     *   <li><b>Walk:</b> traverse the file tree and attempt to delete each 
file/directory once.
+     *       Failures are silently collected without retrying.</li>
+     *   <li><b>Batch retry:</b> if {@code retryOnError} is enabled and there 
were failures,
+     *       sleep once ({@value #BATCH_RETRY_DELAY_MS}ms) to let external 
processes release
+     *       file locks, then retry all failures together.</li>
+     * </ol>
+     *
+     * <p>Any files that still cannot be deleted after the batch retry will be 
cleaned up
+     * by the {@linkplain #scanForLeftovers() leftover scan} on the next 
build.</p>
      *
      * <h4>Thread safety</h4>
-     * Contrarily to most other methods in {@code BackgroundCleaner}, this 
method is
-     * thread-safe because it uses a copy of this cleaner for walking in the 
file tree.
+     * This method is designed to run in the background executor thread. It 
does not share
+     * any mutable state with the main thread except through {@link 
#errorOccurred(IOException)},
+     * which is synchronized.
+     *
+     * @param dir          the directory to delete
+     * @param force        whether to force the deletion of read-only files
+     * @param retryOnError whether to undertake a batch retry of failed 
deletions
      */
-    private void deleteSilently(final Path dir) {
+    private void deleteInBackground(Path dir, boolean force, boolean 
retryOnError) {
+        logger.debug("Deleting " + dir + " in background.");
+        List<Path> failures = new ArrayList<>();
         try {
-            Files.walkFileTree(dir, Set.of(), Integer.MAX_VALUE, new 
Cleaner(this));
+            Files.walkFileTree(dir, Set.of(), Integer.MAX_VALUE, new 
SimpleFileVisitor<>() {
+                /**
+                 * Current depth relative to the root directory, used by 
{@link Cleaner#setWritable}
+                 * to walk up to the parent when the file itself is already 
writable.
+                 */
+                int depth;
+
+                @Override
+                public FileVisitResult preVisitDirectory(Path d, 
BasicFileAttributes attrs) {
+                    if (ON_WINDOWS && attrs.isOther()) {
+                        // MCLEAN-93: NTFS junctions have isDirectory() and 
isOther() attributes set.
+                        // Delete the junction itself and skip its contents to 
avoid deleting the
+                        // contents of the junction target, which may be 
outside the project.
+                        if (!tryDeleteOnce(d, force, depth)) {
+                            failures.add(d);
+                        }
+                        return FileVisitResult.SKIP_SUBTREE;
+                    }
+                    depth++;
+                    return FileVisitResult.CONTINUE;
+                }
+
+                @Override
+                public FileVisitResult visitFile(Path file, 
BasicFileAttributes attrs) {
+                    if (!tryDeleteOnce(file, force, depth)) {
+                        failures.add(file);
+                    }
+                    return FileVisitResult.CONTINUE;
+                }
+
+                @Override
+                public FileVisitResult postVisitDirectory(Path d, IOException 
exc) {
+                    depth--;
+                    if (!tryDeleteOnce(d, force, depth)) {
+                        failures.add(d);
+                    }
+                    return FileVisitResult.CONTINUE;
+                }
+
+                @Override
+                public FileVisitResult visitFileFailed(Path file, IOException 
exc) {
+                    failures.add(file);
+                    return FileVisitResult.CONTINUE;
+                }
+            });
         } catch (IOException e) {
             errorOccurred(e);
+            return;
+        }
+        if (!failures.isEmpty() && retryOnError) {
+            try {
+                Thread.sleep(BATCH_RETRY_DELAY_MS);
+            } catch (InterruptedException e) {
+                Thread.currentThread().interrupt();
+                // Report collected failures before returning.
+                errorOccurred(buildFailureException(failures));
+                return;
+            }
+            List<Path> remaining = new ArrayList<>();
+            for (Path path : failures) {
+                if (!tryDeleteOnce(path, force, 0)) {
+                    remaining.add(path);
+                }
+            }
+            if (!remaining.isEmpty()) {
+                errorOccurred(buildFailureException(remaining));
+            }
+        } else if (!failures.isEmpty()) {
+            errorOccurred(buildFailureException(failures));
+        }
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Builds an {@link IOException} that reports the failing paths (capped at 
10) and total count.
+     *
+     * @param failures the list of paths that could not be deleted
+     * @return an exception describing the failures
+     */
+    private static IOException buildFailureException(List<Path> failures) {
+        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("Failed to delete ")
+                .append(failures.size())
+                .append(" path(s) during background clean");
+        int limit = Math.min(failures.size(), 10);
+        for (int i = 0; i < limit; i++) {
+            sb.append("\n  ").append(failures.get(i));
+        }
+        if (failures.size() > limit) {
+            sb.append("\n  ... and ").append(failures.size() - limit).append(" 
more");
+        }
+        return new IOException(sb.toString());
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * Tries to delete a single file or directory once, without retry delays 
or {@code System.gc()}.
+     * If {@code force} is enabled and deletion fails with {@link 
AccessDeniedException},
+     * the file (or its parent directory) is made writable and deletion is 
retried immediately (once).
+     *
+     * @param file  the file or directory to delete
+     * @param force whether to make read-only files writable before retrying
+     * @param currentDepth the depth of the file relative to the staged root, 
used by
+     *                     {@link Cleaner#setWritable} to walk up to the 
parent directory
+     * @return {@code true} if the file was deleted or did not exist
+     */
+    private static boolean tryDeleteOnce(Path file, boolean force, int 
currentDepth) {
+        try {
+            Files.deleteIfExists(file);
+            return true;
+        } catch (AccessDeniedException e) {
+            if (force) {
+                try {
+                    Cleaner.setWritable(file, currentDepth);

Review Comment:
   Reopening for the one point from this thread that is *not* covered by 
`fca73f3`: `failOnError` does not apply to the background path.
   
   The `setWritable` loop is fixed — verified, and both the new unit test and 
the `read-only-fast` IT fail if I revert it, so that part is properly guarded. 
Thanks.
   
   But `failOnError=true` (the default) is still ignored once deletion moves to 
the background thread. Same project, same plugin configuration, only `fast` 
differs, against `fca73f3` with `force=false`, `retryOnError=false`, 
`failOnError=true` and a `target/read-only-dir` at `dr-xr-xr-x` holding a file 
at `r--r--r--`:
   
   **`fast=false`** — exit code 1:
   
   ```
   [ERROR] Failed to execute goal ...:clean (default-clean) on project probe: 
Failed to clean project:
           .../target/read-only-dir/read-only.properties
   ```
   
   **`fast=true`** — exit code 0:
   
   ```
   [WARNING] Errors during background file deletion.
   java.io.IOException: Failed to delete 3 path(s) during background clean
     .../.fastdir/probe-…/read-only-dir/read-only.properties
     .../.fastdir/probe-…/read-only-dir
     .../.fastdir/probe-…
   [INFO] BUILD SUCCESS
   ```
   
   with those three paths still on disk afterwards. So turning on `fast` 
silently downgrades a configured build failure to a warning, and the leftovers 
stay in the staging directory until some later build's leftover scan happens to 
clear them.
   
   This is not a regression from this PR — the background path never honoured 
`failOnError` — so it is a reasonable thing to leave out of scope. But it is 
now the sharpest remaining difference between the two paths, and `failOnError` 
is the knob users reach for precisely because they want the build to stop.
   
   Options, in increasing order of effort:
   
   1. Document it: note in the `fast` / `failOnError` parameter Javadoc and on 
the plugin site that `failOnError` has no effect in fast mode.
   2. Honour it: `BackgroundCleaner` already collects the errors and `onEvent` 
already waits for the executor before `run()`, so the accumulated `IOException` 
could be thrown (or reported as a build failure) from there when the 
originating configuration had `failOnError=true` — which would mean capturing 
`failOnError` per submitted directory alongside `force` and `retryOnError` in 
`DeferredDeletion`.
   
   Happy with either, including just option 1, or with a follow-up issue. 
Flagging it so the decision is explicit rather than implied.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to