[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15597729#comment-15597729
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-495:
---------------------------------------

Github user dlyle65535 commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/318
  
    I ran this up on EC2 and found a couple of issues:
    
    1) Flume has the wrong java_home so the flume-agent process will not start. 
This is an ongoing issue each time we change the stack version, I recommend we 
modify deployment to:
    
    - Use Ambari to install Flume 
    
    - Remove Flume entirely and just pipe alert.csv to pipe to 
kafka-console-producer
    
    2) The /tmp directory on the enrichment host was filled with files in the 
form md5.jar. They filled the entire 50GB volume. As a result, the topologies 
couldn't start. I can did into this a bit more next week.



> Upgrade Storm to 1.0.x
> ----------------------
>
>                 Key: METRON-495
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-495
>             Project: Metron
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Justin Leet
>            Assignee: Justin Leet
>
> As listed at https://storm.apache.org/2016/04/12/storm100-released.html, 
> there's a variety of improvements with Storm 1.0.  The obvious and likely 
> most important improvement is to performance, but a variety of other 
> improvements are noted on that link.
> There are several changes that have to occur in order to make this upgrade.  
> As noted in http://storm.apache.org/releases/current/index.html, Storm's code 
> packages moved from backtype.storm to org.apache.storm, meaning all 
> topologies have to be recompiled if that change.  There is a runtime 
> converter to run things in place with backtype.storm, but this doesn't appear 
> to be enough for our case because a couple interfaces change from byte[] to 
> ByteBuffer (somewhat, but not entirely, related to 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1449). Even without this issue, 
> the long term solution is to use the new package naming.
> In addition, our dev instances right now spin up an HDP 2.4 instance, which 
> matches our current version of Storm. HDP 2.5 uses Storm 1.0.1, so to migrate 
> to Storm 1.0.x, I'd prefer to match that version, rather than going to 1.0.2.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to