[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-495?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15602054#comment-15602054
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on METRON-495:
---------------------------------------
Github user justinleet closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-metron/pull/310
> Upgrade Storm to 1.0.x
> ----------------------
>
> Key: METRON-495
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/METRON-495
> Project: Metron
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Justin Leet
> Assignee: Justin Leet
>
> As listed at https://storm.apache.org/2016/04/12/storm100-released.html,
> there's a variety of improvements with Storm 1.0. The obvious and likely
> most important improvement is to performance, but a variety of other
> improvements are noted on that link.
> There are several changes that have to occur in order to make this upgrade.
> As noted in http://storm.apache.org/releases/current/index.html, Storm's code
> packages moved from backtype.storm to org.apache.storm, meaning all
> topologies have to be recompiled if that change. There is a runtime
> converter to run things in place with backtype.storm, but this doesn't appear
> to be enough for our case because a couple interfaces change from byte[] to
> ByteBuffer (somewhat, but not entirely, related to
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-1449). Even without this issue,
> the long term solution is to use the new package naming.
> In addition, our dev instances right now spin up an HDP 2.4 instance, which
> matches our current version of Storm. HDP 2.5 uses Storm 1.0.1, so to migrate
> to Storm 1.0.x, I'd prefer to match that version, rather than going to 1.0.2.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
