[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2157?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15381092#comment-15381092
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on NIFI-2157:
--------------------------------------

Github user JPercivall commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/645
  
    @mattyb149, just finished doing a simple verification of functionality 
using MySQL. I set up a flow to grab from randomapi.com changed one of the 
fields to an incrementing number and inserted it using PutSQL. I then observed 
GenerateTableFetch create SELECT statements for over those events which I then 
passed to ExecuteSQL.
    
    Once the comments above are addressed it looks good to me.


> Add GenerateTableFetch processor
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-2157
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-2157
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Matt Burgess
>            Assignee: Matt Burgess
>             Fix For: 1.0.0
>
>
> This processor would presumably operate like QueryDatabaseTable, except it 
> will contain a "Partition Size" property, and rather than executing the SQL 
> statement(s) to fetch rows, it would generate flow files containing SQL 
> statements that will select rows from a table. If the partition size is 
> indicated, then the SELECT statements will refer to a range of rows, such 
> that each statement will grab only a portion of the table. If max-value 
> columns are specified, then only rows whose observed values for those columns 
> exceed the current maximum will be fetched (i.e. like QueryDatabaseTable). 
> These flow files (due to NIFI-1973) can be passed to ExecuteSQL processors 
> for the actual fetching of rows, and ExecuteSQL can be distributed across 
> cluster nodes and/or multiple tasks. These features enable distributed 
> incremental fetching of rows from database table(s).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to