exceptionfactory commented on a change in pull request #4715:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/4715#discussion_r538821132



##########
File path: 
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-encrypt-config/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/properties/ConfigEncryptionToolTest.groovy
##########
@@ -4053,18 +4062,158 @@ class ConfigEncryptionToolTest extends GroovyTestCase {
                 def verifyTool = new ConfigEncryptionTool()
                 verifyTool.isVerbose = true
                 verifyTool.flowXmlPath = workingFlowXmlFile.path
-                String updatedFlowXmlContent = verifyTool.loadFlowXml()
+                InputStream updatedFlowXmlContent = 
verifyTool.loadFlowXml(workingFlowXmlFile.path)
 
-                // Check that the flow.xml.gz content changed
-                assert updatedFlowXmlContent != ORIGINAL_FLOW_XML_CONTENT
+                def migratedFlowCipherTexts = 
findFieldsInStream(updatedFlowXmlContent, WFXCTR)
 
                 // Verify that the cipher texts decrypt correctly
                 logger.info("Original flow.xml.gz cipher texts: 
${originalFlowCipherTexts}")
-                def flowCipherTexts = updatedFlowXmlContent.findAll(WFXCTR)
-                logger.info("Updated  flow.xml.gz cipher texts: 
${flowCipherTexts}")
-                assert flowCipherTexts.size() == CIPHER_TEXT_COUNT
-                flowCipherTexts.every {
-                    assert ConfigEncryptionTool.decryptFlowElement(it, 
newFlowPassword) == "thisIsABadPassword"
+                logger.info("Updated  flow.xml.gz cipher texts: 
${migratedFlowCipherTexts}")
+                assert migratedFlowCipherTexts.size() == CIPHER_TEXT_COUNT
+                migratedFlowCipherTexts.each {
+                    String decryptedValue = 
ConfigEncryptionTool.decryptFlowElement(it, newFlowPassword)
+                    logger.info("Decrypted value of migrated 
${workingFlowXmlFile.path} was: ${decryptedValue}")
+                    assert decryptedValue == PASSWORD || decryptedValue == 
ANOTHER_PASSWORD
+                }
+            }
+        })
+
+        // Act
+        ConfigEncryptionTool.main(args)
+        logger.info("Invoked #main with ${args.join(" ")}")
+
+        // Assert
+
+        // Assertions defined above

Review comment:
       It looks like this comment and the one above should be removed.

##########
File path: 
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-encrypt-config/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/properties/ConfigEncryptionToolTest.groovy
##########
@@ -287,7 +291,10 @@ class ConfigEncryptionToolTest extends GroovyTestCase {
 
         // Assert
         assert !TestAppender.events.isEmpty()
-        assert TestAppender.events.first().message =~ "The source 
nifi.properties and destination nifi.properties are identical \\[.*\\] so the 
original will be overwritten"
+        assert TestAppender.events.stream().any() {
+            it.message =~ "The source nifi.properties and destination 
nifi.properties are identical \\[.*\\] so the original will be overwritten"
+        }
+        //assert TestAppender.events.first().message =~ "The source 
nifi.properties and destination nifi.properties are identical \\[.*\\] so the 
original will be overwritten"

Review comment:
       It looks like this commented line should be removed.

##########
File path: 
nifi-toolkit/nifi-toolkit-encrypt-config/src/main/groovy/org/apache/nifi/properties/ConfigEncryptionTool.groovy
##########
@@ -64,8 +68,8 @@ class ConfigEncryptionTool {
     public String outputLoginIdentityProvidersPath
     public String authorizersPath
     public String outputAuthorizersPath
-    public String flowXmlPath
-    public String outputFlowXmlPath
+    public static flowXmlPath
+    public static outputFlowXmlPath

Review comment:
       Is there a reason these values are static?




----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


Reply via email to