nandorsoma opened a new pull request #5475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5475
<!--
Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
(the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
-->
Thank you for submitting a contribution to Apache NiFi.
Please provide a short description of the PR here:
#### Description of PR
This pull request adds update filename functionality to the InvokeHTTP
processor. If the property is set to true and the request method is GET, it
will update the FlowFile's filename with a value fetched from the url. In ideal
situation it will be the last element of the path, but I tried to prepare for
edge cases, so for example for a "bare url" without path and query params it
will be the hostname.
There are two things that I wasn't sure about:
- In this processor boolean properties can either start with uppercase or
lowercase letter. I wasn't sure which one to use, so I've checked out other
processors and the ones I saw used lowercase so I used that one. Although it
raises the question that wouldn't it worth to make them consistent?
- It seems to me one processor means strictly one test class. I wanted to
write a parameterized test but with junit4 a separate class needs to be
created. I tried to write it in HTTPInvokeTest without @Parameterized, but it
became really hacky so I decided to stay with the separate class approach. Is
it good like that?
Please let me know what do you think about my two questions and of course
also about the whole pr.
In order to streamline the review of the contribution we ask you
to ensure the following steps have been taken:
### For all changes:
- [x] Is there a JIRA ticket associated with this PR? Is it referenced
in the commit message?
- [x] Does your PR title start with **NIFI-XXXX** where XXXX is the JIRA
number you are trying to resolve? Pay particular attention to the hyphen "-"
character.
- [x] Has your PR been rebased against the latest commit within the target
branch (typically `main`)?
- [x] Is your initial contribution a single, squashed commit? _Additional
commits in response to PR reviewer feedback should be made on this branch and
pushed to allow change tracking. Do not `squash` or use `--force` when pushing
to allow for clean monitoring of changes._
### For code changes:
- [x] Have you ensured that the full suite of tests is executed via `mvn
-Pcontrib-check clean install` at the root `nifi` folder?
- [x] Have you written or updated unit tests to verify your changes?
- [x] Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 8?
- [ ] Have you verified that the full build is successful on JDK 11?
- [ ] If adding new dependencies to the code, are these dependencies
licensed in a way that is compatible for inclusion under [ASF
2.0](http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-a)?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `LICENSE` file, including the main
`LICENSE` file under `nifi-assembly`?
- [ ] If applicable, have you updated the `NOTICE` file, including the main
`NOTICE` file found under `nifi-assembly`?
- [x] If adding new Properties, have you added `.displayName` in addition to
.name (programmatic access) for each of the new properties?
### For documentation related changes:
- [ ] Have you ensured that format looks appropriate for the output in which
it is rendered?
### Note:
Please ensure that once the PR is submitted, you check GitHub Actions CI for
build issues and submit an update to your PR as soon as possible.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
