[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17507771#comment-17507771
 ] 

Tamas Palfy commented on NIFI-9797:
-----------------------------------

The "fix" provided for the issue was rushed.
It actually made things worse! _Now_ the code can result in errors that 
wouldn't have been possible before.

It seems the "margin" concept was not clear.
The idea is to renew the ticket _way before_ the last possible second. To leave 
us some room - a margin of error so to speak.

The current implementation _adds_ 5 extra seconds when we consider the ticket 
_not_ expired - even when it _has_.
In case of a busy processor this can lead to an unnecessary failure.

Opening another ticket.

> AccessToken isExpired broken
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-9797
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-9797
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.16.0
>            Reporter: Lawrence
>            Assignee: David Handermann
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: 1.16.0
>
>          Time Spent: 20m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> While using a build of the current snapshot (1.16.0) so i could use the new 
> StandardOAuth2AccessTokenProvider I ran into an issue with how the 
> AccessToken got changed to calculate if the token is expired.  This is going 
> to break potentially a lot of folks using that AccessToken.  It's subtracting 
> 5000 seconds from the expiresIn property.  I think it was assumed that 
> expires_in would be in millis also, but it is not, per OAuth standards:
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc6749#section-4.2.2]
> Here is a link to the PR that got merged where I added a comment ( to little 
> to late ).
> [https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/5319#pullrequestreview-909366668]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)

Reply via email to