Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2158#discussion_r140446942
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-azure-bundle/nifi-azure-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/adls/ADLSConstants.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.nifi.processors.adls;
+
+import org.apache.nifi.components.PropertyDescriptor;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.Relationship;
+import org.apache.nifi.processor.util.StandardValidators;
+
+
+public class ADLSConstants {
+
+ public static final int CHUNK_SIZE_IN_BYTES = 4000000;
+
+ public static final PropertyDescriptor PATH_NAME = new
PropertyDescriptor.Builder()
+ .name("Path")
--- End diff --
Could you use ``.name()`` and ``.displayName()`` ?
Name cannot be changed once we release the processor because it'd break
backward compatibility on existing workflow. But we can change the display name
as it's only used in logs/UI. We usually use a script-friendly naming for the
name field (no whitespace, lower case, etc). For instance:
adls-overwrite-policy.
---
