Github user JohannesDaniel commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2199#discussion_r145712892
  
    --- Diff: 
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-solr-bundle/nifi-solr-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/solr/GetSolr.java
 ---
    @@ -66,42 +79,72 @@
     import org.apache.solr.common.SolrDocument;
     import org.apache.solr.common.SolrDocumentList;
     import org.apache.solr.common.SolrInputDocument;
    +import org.apache.solr.common.params.CursorMarkParams;
     
    -@Tags({"Apache", "Solr", "Get", "Pull"})
    +@Tags({"Apache", "Solr", "Get", "Pull", "Records"})
     @InputRequirement(Requirement.INPUT_FORBIDDEN)
    -@CapabilityDescription("Queries Solr and outputs the results as a 
FlowFile")
    +@CapabilityDescription("Queries Solr and outputs the results as a FlowFile 
in the format of XML or using a Record Writer")
    +@Stateful(scopes = {Scope.CLUSTER}, description = "Stores latest date of 
Date Field so that the same data will not be fetched multiple times.")
     public class GetSolr extends SolrProcessor {
     
    -    public static final PropertyDescriptor SOLR_QUERY = new 
PropertyDescriptor
    -            .Builder().name("Solr Query")
    -            .description("A query to execute against Solr")
    +    public static final String STATE_MANAGER_FILTER = 
"stateManager_filter";
    +    public static final String STATE_MANAGER_CURSOR_MARK = 
"stateManager_cursorMark";
    +    public static final AllowableValue MODE_XML = new 
AllowableValue("XML");
    +    public static final AllowableValue MODE_REC = new 
AllowableValue("Records");
    --- End diff --
    
    Principally yes, by using the Schema API. But I dont expect this to be too 
easy. I suggest that we create a separate ticket for this as it should require 
some deeper considerations.


---

Reply via email to