Github user pvillard31 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi/pull/2440#discussion_r165593121
--- Diff:
nifi-nar-bundles/nifi-azure-bundle/nifi-azure-processors/src/main/java/org/apache/nifi/processors/azure/storage/ListAzureBlobStorage.java
---
@@ -106,7 +106,8 @@
attributes.put("azure.etag", entity.getEtag());
attributes.put("azure.primaryUri", entity.getPrimaryUri());
attributes.put("azure.secondaryUri", entity.getSecondaryUri());
- attributes.put("azure.blobname", entity.getName());
+ attributes.put("azure.blobname", entity.getBlobName());
+ attributes.put("filename", entity.getName());
--- End diff --
I'm a bit worried about this change. It's going to change the value of a
core attribute (filename) that could break the behavior of existing workflows.
I'd rather user another attribute name if we still want to have an attribute
for ``entity.getName()``. Thoughts?
---
