Github user jzonthemtn commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/120#discussion_r177757827
--- Diff:
minifi-c2/minifi-c2-framework/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/minifi/c2/core/service/StandardC2ProtocolServiceSpec.groovy
---
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
+ * contributor license agreements. See the NOTICE file distributed with
+ * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
+ * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
+ * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
+ * the License. You may obtain a copy of the License at
+ *
+ * http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
+ *
+ * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
+ * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
+ * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
+ * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
+ * limitations under the License.
+ */
+package org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.core.service
+
+import
org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.api.provider.heartbeat.HeartbeatPersistenceProvider
+import org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.model.*
+import spock.lang.Specification
+
+class StandardC2ProtocolServiceSpec extends Specification {
--- End diff --
Just curious if there was a technical reason for using Groovy for the test?
I don't know a whole lot about groovy so I could be missing something that's
otherwise obvious.
---
