Github user jzonthemtn commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi/pull/120#discussion_r177855956
  
    --- Diff: 
minifi-c2/minifi-c2-framework/src/test/groovy/org/apache/nifi/minifi/c2/core/service/StandardC2ProtocolServiceSpec.groovy
 ---
    @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
    +/*
    + * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one or more
    + * contributor license agreements.  See the NOTICE file distributed with
    + * this work for additional information regarding copyright ownership.
    + * The ASF licenses this file to You under the Apache License, Version 2.0
    + * (the "License"); you may not use this file except in compliance with
    + * the License.  You may obtain a copy of the License at
    + *
    + *     http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
    + *
    + * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
    + * distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
    + * WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
    + * See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
    + * limitations under the License.
    + */
    +package org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.core.service
    +
    +import 
org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.api.provider.heartbeat.HeartbeatPersistenceProvider
    +import org.apache.nifi.minifi.c2.model.*
    +import spock.lang.Specification
    +
    +class StandardC2ProtocolServiceSpec extends Specification {
    --- End diff --
    
    Thanks for the details! Sounds like something worth checking out. I 
remember seeing a discussion not too long ago on the mailing list concerning 
JVM-based languages in the code base. (I don't remember if anything actually 
came out of it or not.) Anyway, I think it's pretty cool because otherwise I 
probably wouldn't have been exposed to this.


---

Reply via email to