[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-648?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16675351#comment-16675351
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on MINIFICPP-648:
------------------------------------------

Github user phrocker commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/nifi-minifi-cpp/pull/432#discussion_r230803774
  
    --- Diff: libminifi/CMakeLists.txt ---
    @@ -141,11 +141,14 @@ endif()
     SET (LIBMINIFI core-minifi PARENT_SCOPE)
     
     if (ENABLE_PYTHON)
    -if (NOT APPLE)
     #### shared
     
     add_library(core-minifi-shared SHARED ${SOURCES})
    -target_link_libraries(core-minifi-shared ${CMAKE_DL_LIBS} uuid-shared 
yaml-cpp)
    +if (APPLE)
    --- End diff --
    
    Indeed -- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-660 already 
exists. I've pre-empted that in favor of CoAP, but should get back to that 
soon. Python is kind of WIP. I do have some tests from that branch that cover 
what you are talking about. I'll try and re-surface them as soon as I get away 
from CoAP. 


> add processor and add processor with linkage nomenclature is confusing
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MINIFICPP-648
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MINIFICPP-648
>             Project: NiFi MiNiFi C++
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Mr TheSegfault
>            Assignee: Arpad Boda
>            Priority: Blocker
>              Labels: CAPI
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> add_processor should be changed to always add a processor with linkage 
> without compelling documentation as why this exists.. As a result we will 
> need to add a create_processor function to create one without adding it to 
> the flow ( certain use cases where a flow isn't needed such as invokehttp or 
> listenhttp ) this can be moved to 0.7.0 if we tag before recent commits. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to