https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122518
jan iversen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #13 from jan iversen <[email protected]> --- All the changes I made was agreed on the dev-list, however of course if they break a build they must be reverted without disucssion (we can always later discuss, why a discussion on the dev list and consensus, isnt enough). I have now reverted /trunk/main/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu I do however highly disagree with the use of non-translateable constants, that at the same time are marked with [en-US] this is highly inconsistent, and can only lead to confusion. The constant is valid in e.g. danish as well, and are not special for [en-US] as indicated. I have not reverted main/sw/source/ui/config/modcfg.cxx or /main/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Writer.xcu as written in other comments (which I highly agree to), this is not the way to use the translation system. If it is a required feature, we can forget the new genLang module. We agreed on the dev list to remove all non en-US entries. - Comments intended for translator ... could be kept and then ported to the PO file as comments for the translator actually this is only partly happening with the current system, some of the comments are very old, and does not reflect the actual translation. We agreed on the dev-list to remove these comments. If they are to be kept, we can forget the new genLang. I hope I have replied to all comments, and done the correct reverts. In case something is missing please feel free to do the revert (I will not be offended). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
