https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122518
--- Comment #14 from Ariel Constenla-Haile <[email protected]> --- (In reply to jan iversen from comment #13) > All the changes I made was agreed on the dev-list, however of course if they > break a build they must be reverted without disucssion (we can always later > discuss, why a discussion on the dev list and consensus, isnt enough). > > I have now reverted > > /trunk/main/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu I have already done this as part of revision 1493305 (the commit notification system seems broken) as in > /main/officecfg/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Writer.xcu a revert here is not enough, this needs a fix by adding x-no-translate in the respective places. > as written in other comments (which I highly agree to), this is not the way > to use the translation system. If it is a required feature, we can forget > the new genLang module. this is partial fix for 4.0.0, the best way seems to be the use of install:module="some_l10n_module", but I have to investigate how this is done. For now let's keep it simple: revision 1493305 as few safe lines, enough for 4.0.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
