bdoyle0182 commented on a change in pull request #5194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5194#discussion_r799053221
##########
File path: ansible/README.md
##########
@@ -148,6 +148,58 @@ ansible-playbook -i environments/$ENVIRONMENT prereq.yml
**Hint:** During playbook execution the `TASK [prereq : check for pip]` can
show as failed. This is normal if no pip is installed. The playbook will then
move on and install pip on the target machines.
+### [Optional] Enable the new scheduler
+
+You can enable the new scheduler of OpenWhisk.
+It will run one more component called "scheduler" and ETCD.
+
+#### Configure service providers for the scheduler
+You can update service providers for the scheduler as follows.
+
+**common/scala/src/main/resources**
+```
+whisk.spi {
Review comment:
shouldn't a provider for the scheduler db required here? i.e.
`ETCDProvider`?
##########
File path: ansible/README.md
##########
@@ -148,6 +148,58 @@ ansible-playbook -i environments/$ENVIRONMENT prereq.yml
**Hint:** During playbook execution the `TASK [prereq : check for pip]` can
show as failed. This is normal if no pip is installed. The playbook will then
move on and install pip on the target machines.
+### [Optional] Enable the new scheduler
+
+You can enable the new scheduler of OpenWhisk.
+It will run one more component called "scheduler" and ETCD.
+
+#### Configure service providers for the scheduler
+You can update service providers for the scheduler as follows.
+
+**common/scala/src/main/resources**
+```
+whisk.spi {
Review comment:
shouldn't a provider for the scheduler db be required here? i.e.
`ETCDProvider`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
