style95 commented on a change in pull request #5194:
URL: https://github.com/apache/openwhisk/pull/5194#discussion_r790246133
##########
File path: common/scala/src/main/resources/application.conf
##########
@@ -197,6 +209,11 @@ whisk {
retention-bytes = 1073741824
retention-ms = 3600000
}
+ actions {
Review comment:
Yes, this configuration is for topics, `schedulerN` and these topics are
used to forward activations from controllers to schedulers.
I feel it would be better to rename it to something like `activations`.
##########
File path: common/scala/src/main/resources/application.conf
##########
@@ -197,6 +209,11 @@ whisk {
retention-bytes = 1073741824
retention-ms = 3600000
}
+ actions {
Review comment:
Yes, this configuration is for topics, `schedulerN` and these topics are
used to forward activations from controllers to schedulers.
I feel it would be better to rename it to something like `activations` or
`schedulers`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
