ivandika3 commented on PR #6989: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6989#issuecomment-3956078125
@xichen01 Let's reopen this patch and move this forward. I am willing spend some time on the storage policy support development. Hopefully other community members (@errose28 @chungen0126) are also able to help to push the review process. @greenwich As mentioned in the https://github.com/apache/ozone/discussions/8811#discussioncomment-13928693 discussion last year. There are mainly two phases of Ozone Storage Policy Support 1. Supporting storage policy and storage types on Ozone 2. Storage Policy Migration support Phase 1 goal is to allow client to upload keys with different storage policy and integrate storage policy and types to all Ozone pipeline, containers, etc. This will be our short term focus now since we are not introducing any new subsystem Phase 2 goal is to support Storage Policy Migration. However, our current implementation requires a separate job worker subsystem. This will be longer term since we are introducing some new subsystem. If you don't require a separate job worker subsystem, you might need to write your own implementation of "Storage Policy Satisfier". That said, hope you understand that all contributions to Ozone are purely voluntary and made by members with other higher level priorities and therefore we cannot 100% guarantee that this will be done in a timely manner. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
