greenwich commented on PR #6989: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/6989#issuecomment-3956982569
@ivandika3 Thanks for the clarification — that makes sense. I fully understand that contributions are voluntary, and I really appreciate the time and effort everyone is putting into this. I’m very interested in helping move this forward and would be glad to contribute where it makes the most sense. Regarding Phase 2, just thinking ahead — would it make sense to initially target a simpler mover-style implementation (similar in spirit to HDFS Mover) before introducing a separate job worker subsystem? That might allow basic Storage Policy Migration functionality to be delivered earlier and iterated on over time. Of course, I’m happy to align with the broader design direction — just exploring whether an incremental path could also work here. Please let me know how I can best contribute. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
