sodonnel commented on PR #4922: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/4922#issuecomment-1596960704
> This patch uses omUuid as the owner of SCM container. > > However, a better option for the container owner is to pick a unique ID for the a single OM HA service (instead of nodeID). I think the omID needs to be the same for all om instances in a HA group. There should not be a need to close all containers on SCM just because there is an OM leader switch. I am also not sure about the need to have different containers for different OM HA groups sharing a single SCM. OM just deals with blocks, SCM groups blocks into containers. I am not sure if we need to be sure that the blocks from OM group 1 do not mix with blocks from OM group 2 in the same containers. We don't have storage policies in Ozone at the moment, and even when we do, there is going to be a mix of "hot" and "cold" data in the same containers. Having blocks from two different OM HA groups in the same container doesn't sound much different to that. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
