ivandika3 commented on PR #4922: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/4922#issuecomment-1597186874
@sodonnel Thank you for your input. > I think the omID needs to be the same for all om instances in a HA group. There should not be a need to close all containers on SCM just because there is an OM leader switch. I agree. Maybe instead of coming up with a new unique id I can find a way to synchronize the omID instead and use it as the OM HA service identifier. Please let me know what you think. > I am also not sure about the need to have different containers for different OM HA groups sharing a single SCM. I also have doubts regarding the necessity of this. Since I'm not really well-versed in the SCM-side yet, I decided to take the conservative approach and try to maximize the resource isolation (i.e. distinct containers for OM HA groups). I did some tests manually in my cluster, currently there was no apparent issue. Anyway I think the single unique ID for a single OM HA group is still a worthwhile endeavor. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
