ivandika3 commented on PR #4922: URL: https://github.com/apache/ozone/pull/4922#issuecomment-1765721263
@adoroszlai @sodonnel I think OM Service ID should suffice as the container owner for now. FYI, our cluster have two OM clusters due to stability issues when sharing a single OM services among different workloads which will affect. Therefore, we spinned up a new OM service to isolate a specific critical use case from being affected by other workloads. Container owner is just a possible contention that we identified when we were analyzing the safety of having two OM services sharing a single SCM. Regarding the plan to support the ec container to the owner, I currently do not have prerequisite EC knowledge and bandwidth to address this. This can be addressed in different ticket after this is merged, or we can close this ticket and change the container's owner once the solution of "support the ec container to the owner" is already finalized. I'll leave it to your discretions @adoroszlai @sodonnel @guohao-rosicky. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
