apupier commented on PR #8171:
URL: https://github.com/apache/paimon/pull/8171#issuecomment-4727138865
> The concurrency pattern is inconsistent across this PR: utitcase-jdk11.yml
uses cancel-in-progress: true while the other 4 files use cancel-in-progress:
${{ github.event_name == 'pull_request' }}
When the workflow can be triggered only by pull_request event, I proposed a
simplified value for cancel-in-progress.
Do you prefer to align to use the same concurrency pattern or keep as
proposed?
> Also,
e2e-tests-[flink-1](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-1).x.yml
already had a
> working concurrency block
this one I changed it to align with other concurrency declaration.
Do you prefer to keep this one not aligned with other concurrency pattern or
to align it?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
