clairemcginty opened a new pull request, #3111:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/3111

   <!--
   Thanks for opening a pull request!
   
   If you're new to Parquet-Java, information on how to contribute can be found 
here: https://parquet.apache.org/docs/contribution-guidelines/contributing
   
   Please open a GitHub issue for this pull request: 
https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/issues/new/choose
   and format pull request title as below:
   
       GH-${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID}: ${SUMMARY}
   
   or simply use the title below if it is a minor issue:
   
       MINOR: ${SUMMARY}
   
   -->
   
   ### Rationale for this change
   
   Fixes logical type conversions for nested records on Avro <= 1.8. This was 
also addressed in https://github.com/apache/parquet-java/pull/1296/files but 
was missing the test case where _all_ logical types are in nested classes and 
there are zero top-level logical types. In this case, invoking 
`clazz.getDeclaredField("conversions")` in AvroRecordConverter throws a 
`NoSuchFieldException` and terminates the loop before attempting to traverse 
the record's inner fields.
   
   ### What changes are included in this PR?
   
   Fixes built-in logical type conversions for Avro records that contain only 
nested logical type fields on <= 1.8
   
   ### Are these changes tested?
   
   Included a test for the case described above
   
   ### Are there any user-facing changes?
   
   
   <!-- Please uncomment the line below and replace ${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID} with the 
actual Github issue id. -->
   <!-- Closes #${GITHUB_ISSUE_ID} -->
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to