orlp commented on PR #221: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/221#issuecomment-2942891846
> I'll just point out that if speed is of the essence then the current proposal already has 3 open source implementations I don't believe either proposal requires a lot of implementation effort. > If there are PMC members who would veto this PR, it's better to know now rather than after a few more months of discussion. If vetoed we can regroup and try again with nan_count. I don't think this is a fair voting procedure if the options are stated as "approve this or veto". Since everyone agrees that the status quo is bad, almost everyone will prefer this over vetoing. At the very least the voting options must include - this proposal, - my proposal, - veto (current proposed solutions not sufficient/defective). -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
