alamb commented on issue #384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/issues/384#issuecomment-3406600810

   > What do you think about this rough idea?
   
   I think the hardest thing will be getting agreement on what "core" or 
"primary" implementations
   
   I really like the idea of listing all optional Parquet features and making 
it more visible what features are supported by what implementations. I am 
personally a  large fan of the compatibility list on the parquet site as it 
already has most of this info:
   - https://parquet.apache.org/docs/file-format/implementationstatus/
   
   Maybe we need to make that more visible / findable on the page 🤔 
   
   
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to