pitrou commented on issue #384: URL: https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/issues/384#issuecomment-3406653123
> I really like the idea of listing all optional Parquet features and making it more visible what features are supported by what implementations. I am personally a large fan of the compatibility list on the parquet site as it already has most of this info: It has the info for the latest version of each listed implementation, but does not say when it was introduced. > I think the hardest thing will be getting agreement on what "core" or "primary" implementations Granted, but we already have something like this in [Additions/Changes to the Format](https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#additionschanges-to-the-format): > One implementation MUST be [parquet-java](http://github.com/apache/parquet-java). It is preferred that the second implementation be [parquet-cpp](https://github.com/apache/arrow) or [parquet-rs](https://github.com/apache/arrow-rs) [...] also cc @julienledem -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
