Github user twdsilva commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/329#discussion_r211435859
--- Diff:
phoenix-core/src/main/java/org/apache/phoenix/coprocessor/MetaDataEndpointImpl.java
---
@@ -3207,17 +3226,37 @@ public MetaDataMutationResult updateMutation(PTable
table, byte[][] rowKeyMetaDa
}
if (type == PTableType.VIEW
&&
EncodedColumnsUtil.usesEncodedColumnNames(table)) {
- /*
- * When adding a column to a view that uses
encoded column name scheme, we
- * need to modify the CQ counters stored in the
view's physical table. So to
- * make sure clients get the latest PTable, we
need to invalidate the cache
- * entry.
- */
- invalidateList.add(new
ImmutableBytesPtr(MetaDataUtil
- .getPhysicalTableRowForView(table)));
-
-
-
+ /*
+ * When adding a column to a view that
uses encoded column name
+ * scheme, we need to modify the CQ
counters stored in the view's
+ * physical table. So to make sure clients
get the latest PTable, we
+ * need to invalidate the cache entry.
+ */
+ invalidateList.add(new ImmutableBytesPtr(
+
MetaDataUtil.getPhysicalTableRowForView(table)));
+ byte[] parentSchemaName =
+
SchemaUtil.getSchemaNameFromFullName(
+
table.getPhysicalName().getString()).getBytes();
+ byte[] parentTableName =
--- End diff --
done, I should have used the parent table instead of the view table here
---
