[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16652224#comment-16652224
 ] 

Lars Hofhansl commented on PHOENIX-4845:
----------------------------------------

I like this. Can also be use when scanning along an index. If Phoenix can 
correctly optimize the ORDER BY away then we can force a start key as start 
point for the next page.

> Support using Row Value Constructors in OFFSET clause to support paging in 
> tables where the sort order of PK columns varies
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-4845
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-4845
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Thomas D'Silva
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: DESC, SFDC
>
> RVCs along with the LIMIT clause are useful for efficiently paging through 
> rows (see [http://phoenix.apache.org/paged.html]). 
>  However if the sorder order of the PK columns in a table varies we cannot 
> use RVCs. 
> For eg. if the PK of a table is (A  DESC, B) we cannot use the following 
> query to page through the data
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE (A, B) > (?, ?) ORDER BY A DESC, B LIMIT 20
> {code}
> Since the rows are sorted by A desc and then by B descending we need change 
> the comparison order
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE WHERE (A, B) < (?, ?) ORDER BY A DESC, B LIMIT 20
> {code}
> If we supported using RVCs in the offset clause we could use the offset to 
> set the start row of the scan. Clients would not have to have logic to 
> determine the comparison operator.
> {code:java}
> SELECT * FROM TABLE ORDER BY A DESC, B LIMIT 20 OFFSET (?,?)
> {code}
> We would only allow using the offset if the rows are ordered by the sort 
> order of the PK columns.
>  
> FYI [~jfernando_sfdc]



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to