[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5435?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17242022#comment-17242022
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on PHOENIX-5435:
-----------------------------------------

gjacoby126 commented on pull request #913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/phoenix/pull/913#issuecomment-736968410


   The test run is odd -- looks like phoenix-core passed but then there was an 
error in building or shading phoenix-client? I can't reproduce locally -- mvn 
clean install -DskipTests passes for me. 


----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> Annotate HBase WALs with Phoenix Metadata
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: PHOENIX-5435
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PHOENIX-5435
>             Project: Phoenix
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Geoffrey Jacoby
>            Assignee: Geoffrey Jacoby
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: PHOENIX-5435-4.x.patch
>
>
> HBase write-ahead-logs (WALs) drive not only failure recovery, but HBase 
> replication and some HBase backup frameworks. The WALs contain HBase-level 
> metadata such as table and region, but lack Phoenix-level metadata. That 
> means that it's quite difficult to build correct logic that needs to know 
> about Phoenix-level constructs such as multi-tenancy, views, or indexes. 
> HBASE-22622 and HBASE-22623 add the capacity for coprocessors to annotate 
> extra key/value pairs of metadata into the HBase WAL. We should have the 
> option to annotate the tuple <tenant_id, table-or-view-name, timestamp>, or 
> some hashed way to reconstruct that tuple into the WAL. It should have a 
> feature toggle so operators who don't need it don't bear the slight extra 
> storage cost. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to