dimas-b commented on PR #1378: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/1378#issuecomment-2816307383
> Attempt to do the fix in OSS with the rational that doing so will help all REST catalogs which are in similar situations This sounds reasonable to me, but I guess the cycle might be too long. Also, if we run into another similar issue, we'd have to repeat that cycle again. I wonder why Polaris needs to jump through the `Catalog` hoop where we implement and Iceberg `Catalog` which is them plugged into the REST Catalog API? Why not implement the REST Catalog API in a way that accesses storage directly (perhaps reusing FileIO implementations), but not going through another (non-REST) `Catalog` layer? -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@polaris.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
