hemasrishalini commented on PR #4439: URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4439#issuecomment-4458709618
I investigated the existing validation and packaging flow further. From what I found: * LicenseNoticeMerge already fails if LICENSE/NOTICE inputs are missing. * LicenseFileValidation already validates missing and superfluous dependency license mentions. * The distribution packaging also uses the merged output directly via `from(licenseNoticeMerge)`. So I understand now that my current archive presence validation overlaps significantly with the existing implementation. If there is still a specific validation scenario from #4186 that is not currently covered, I’d be happy to continue working on that direction. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
