jbonofre commented on code in PR #4453:
URL: https://github.com/apache/polaris/pull/4453#discussion_r3263568801


##########
CONTRIBUTING.md:
##########
@@ -126,7 +126,13 @@ Contributors may use a variety of tools when preparing 
changes to Polaris, inclu
 * Regardless of how a change is produced, the individual submitting the pull 
request is considered the author of the contribution and is fully responsible 
for it.
 * The pull request author **must understand the implementation end-to-end** 
and be able to **explain and justify the design and code** during review.
 * Tools, including AI systems, **are not** considered contributors. 
**Responsibility and authorship remain with the human** submitting the change.
+  Do not list AI tools as authors or co-authors, and do not include model 
names,
+  model versions, prompts, or reasoning settings unless a maintainer 
explicitly asks
+  for them during review.
 * Contributors are encouraged to **disclose** significant AI assistance in the 
pull request description for transparency.
+  A suitable disclosure is:
+  > AI assistance was used to prepare this change. I have reviewed and 
understand

Review Comment:
   A checkbox is a good idea. It will clearly indicate the contributor that he 
should disclose it.



##########
CONTRIBUTING.md:
##########
@@ -126,7 +126,13 @@ Contributors may use a variety of tools when preparing 
changes to Polaris, inclu
 * Regardless of how a change is produced, the individual submitting the pull 
request is considered the author of the contribution and is fully responsible 
for it.
 * The pull request author **must understand the implementation end-to-end** 
and be able to **explain and justify the design and code** during review.
 * Tools, including AI systems, **are not** considered contributors. 
**Responsibility and authorship remain with the human** submitting the change.
+  Do not list AI tools as authors or co-authors, and do not include model 
names,
+  model versions, prompts, or reasoning settings unless a maintainer 
explicitly asks
+  for them during review.

Review Comment:
   If I fully agree that AI tools should not be author/co-author, I think it's 
ok to share details about the model, tool, etc. It's up to the contributor. The 
minimum is to disclose he's using AI, he can share more if he wants.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to