[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-288?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16570512#comment-16570512
]
Tsz Wo Nicholas Sze commented on RATIS-288:
-------------------------------------------
After removed ratis-proto-shaded/src/main/java/ and
ratis-hadoop-shaded/src/main/java/, {{mvn clean package -DskipTests}} works.
Now, {{mvn -DskipShade test}} failed with
{code}
[ERROR] Failed to execute goal on project ratis-common: Could not resolve
dependencies for project org.apache.ratis:ratis-common:jar:0.3.0-SNAPSHOT:
Failure to find org.apache.ratis:ratis-proto-shaded:jar:0.3.0-SNAPSHOT in
https://repository.apache.org/snapshots was cached in the local repository,
resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of
apache.snapshots has elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help 1]
{code}
Then, I have tried {{mvn install -DskipTests}} and then {{mvn -DskipShade
test}} worked fine.
> Pom cleanup/simplification
> --------------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-288
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-288
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: build
> Reporter: Josh Elser
> Assignee: Josh Elser
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: RATIS-288.005.patch, RATIS-288.005_rat.txt
>
>
> I'm noticing quite a bit of over-complication in the build, mostly around
> ratis-proto-shaded. From what I can tell in the git history, this is holdover
> from quite some time ago (when the module itself was introduced).
> Some weird things I see:
> * Everything being marked as optional
> * Explicit scope=compile being listed (this is the default)
> * Inheriting all configuration from the netty-all pom (not sure why we'd
> want this)
> * Recompilation of source files included in ratis-proto-shaded (shade-plugin
> can do this already)
> My only guess is that some of this was to support the {{skipShade}} option. I
> think I can halve the amount of time for the ratis-proto-shaded model, and
> still support a workflow that will let folks skip re-compilation if they
> haven't changed the protobufs
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
