[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-680?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16932723#comment-16932723
]
Josh Elser commented on RATIS-680:
----------------------------------
On this patch specifically, what's going on with PureJavaCrc32C.java and the
two C files?
It seems like both both of these, you're saying that they're ALv2 licensed
*and* some BSD-like license. That is not common and I would guess isn't quite
right.
Where are you getting the ALv2 header from? Was that something added when the
code was copied?
Justin's message was trying to indicate that you cannot just say "a BSD like
license", it needs to be the verbatim software license from the original
material that was copied.
> Fix LICENSE file issues
> -----------------------
>
> Key: RATIS-680
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RATIS-680
> Project: Ratis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Arpit Agarwal
> Assignee: Arpit Agarwal
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: RATIS-680.01.patch
>
>
> Fix Ratis LICENSE file issues raised by Justin here:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/201909.mbox/%3C573A4F4D-8303-418D-8133-03AAC8085708%40me.com%3E
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
