[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15984572#comment-15984572
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on ROCKETMQ-187:
-----------------------------------------
Github user vongosling commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-rocketmq/pull/96
LGTM
> Measure the code coverage for Integration Tests
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ROCKETMQ-187
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ROCKETMQ-187
> Project: Apache RocketMQ
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: dongeforever
> Assignee: dongeforever
>
> Now we could browse the Unit Tests and IT Tests at
> https://builds.apache.org/analysis/component_measures/?id=org.apache.rocketmq%3Arocketmq-all
> But the IT Test coverage is not correct. It should cover the original sources
> instead of the the classes in test module.
> As for as I known, the coverage report is generated by matching the
> collected data(often using java agent) against a set of classes (the module
> classes compiled from src/main/). you could refer to:
> http://olafsblog.sysbsb.de/measuring-test-coverage-of-integration-tests-for-separated-modules-with-jacoco/
> So we could match the jacoco-it.exec to each module's source classes to get
> the correct IT coverage report.
> By the way, we'd better exclude the classes in the test module.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
