[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16527463#comment-16527463
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on SCB-706:
------------------------------------

coveralls commented on issue #786: [SCB-706]refactor loadbalance filters logic 
to support invocation based filter
URL: 
https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-java-chassis/pull/786#issuecomment-401319677
 
 
   
   [![Coverage 
Status](https://coveralls.io/builds/17755543/badge)](https://coveralls.io/builds/17755543)
   
   Coverage decreased (-0.04%) to 87.098% when pulling 
**e908ce87a2eb662d5df894c439676bbb5a5630cd on liubao68:instance-check** into 
**bb4b6986f21dfa35d8ab83868e9cb7d60ecfe3e0 on apache:master**.
   

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]


> refactor loadbalance filters logic to support invocation based filter
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SCB-706
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-706
>             Project: Apache ServiceComb
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: liubao
>            Assignee: liubao
>            Priority: Major
>
> Why we do this?
>  # When implement invocation based filter, e.g. darklaunch deployment, we 
> need to filter servers based on invocation parameters. But now, we create a 
> Loadbalaner instance for each service, and Robin filter interface can not 
> pass Invocation to it. Before refactor, we doing this by ThreadLocal and 
> cache Invocation, and use in filter implementation. This is error prone and 
> users can't handle this complixity
>  # We have other improvements, e.g. SCB-700, we can do server status check, 
> and add a filter a choose from active servers. We need to consider filter 
> orders and other feature, current implementation not satisfy this.
>  # We want to make loadbalance code handy by remove some compatible fixes. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to