[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16617285#comment-16617285
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on SCB-916:
------------------------------------
coveralls commented on issue #300: SCB-916 Clean up @order annotation in
TransactionAspectConfig.
URL:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-servicecomb-saga/pull/300#issuecomment-421941252
[](https://coveralls.io/builds/19031036)
Coverage remained the same at 92.165% when pulling
**c3dcdf0323189f9020afd7c6b8c5ec3d917acb29 on cherrylzhao:master** into
**d85edd8a1829639879cfcc7bea16efc950f3f741 on apache:master**.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> Clean up @order annotation in TransactionAspectConfig
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SCB-916
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SCB-916
> Project: Apache ServiceComb
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Saga
> Affects Versions: saga-0.3.0
> Reporter: cherrylzhao
> Assignee: cherrylzhao
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: saga-0.3.0
>
>
> @order annotation can’t work in TransactionAspectConfig.java.
> Now, we define the @order(0), @order(1) in Aspect beans, but when I adjust
> the value of order,
> The aspect chains of dynamic proxy bean can’t change.
> Normally we just need
> make sure @Transactional Aspect is last one to the wrapper, so we'd like to
> clean up the @order annotation.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
