[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17325929#comment-17325929
]
David Smiley commented on SOLR-15356:
-------------------------------------
org.apache.solr.client.solrj.MergeIndexesEmbeddedTest: When merging indexes by
core reference, the code was grabbing the IndexReader that has
UninvertingReader, which is now a problem. In a PR I'll change it to use the
"raw" reader. The javadocs for SolrIndexSearcher.getRawReader even advertise
that this method is useful for "addIndexes" (what merging indexes is).
org.apache.solr.schema.TestManagedSchemaAPI.test: The test was adding docValues
after the index already exists. In a PR I'll change the test to toggle
"uninvertible" and have it demonstrate it has an effect.
> Lucene requires consistency across fields
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15356
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Schema and Analysis
> Affects Versions: main (9.0)
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Assignee: David Smiley
> Priority: Blocker
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> LUCENE-9334 requires more consistency across fields (Lucene 9). We must
> accommodate this in some tests which started failing. Example:
> org.apache.solr.index.UninvertDocValuesMergePolicyTest
> "cannot change field "string_add_dv_later" from doc values type=NONE to
> inconsistent doc values type=SORTED"
> From
> org.apache.lucene.index.FieldInfo.verifySameDocValuesType(FieldInfo.java:271)
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
