noblepaul commented on PR #994: URL: https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/994#issuecomment-1237729191
> ConfigNode seems best suited for primary configuration files agree. > For simple data config files (like elevate.xml), plain XML processing is fine without unique Solr abstractions. I agree with this as well. However, this is a slippery slope. We may end up with another feature which has an XML configuration and we will start debating whether the xml file is complex enough to warrant the use of `ConfigNode` API. Anyhow, I'm `+1` for anything as long as I don't see XPath -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
