[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15733?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17625709#comment-17625709
]
Kevin Risden commented on SOLR-15733:
-------------------------------------
> In terms of the dependencies and thus how a user might "notice" or not, isn't
> this going to be done as we just did solrj-zookeeper? Thus an opt-out
> transitive dependency in Solr 9, and opt-in from Solr 10 onwards. Just a
> trivial detail in our codebase between the branches in solrj's build.gradle.
yes that is the plan. separate branch_9x commit like solrj-zookeeper - we
discussed that in the PR semi buried now -
https://github.com/apache/solr/pull/1099#issuecomment-1294043754
> Separate out a solrj-streaming module
> -------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-15733
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-15733
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Jan Høydahl
> Assignee: Joel Bernstein
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 7h 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> The huge amount of streaming expression code under
> {{org.apache.solr.client.solrj.io}} package can be shipped as an optional
> jar. The {{solrj-jdbc}} (or {{solrj-sql}}) modules would then have a
> dependency on this...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
